The fact that he has been 'relied' (not merely 'cited') upon by the Justice, itself speaks of the quality/scholarship of the author. Congratulations. But looking from a wider perspective, this doesn't seem to be a very healthy judicial trend. Despite accepting the scholarship of this article, I have serious reservations about using (or relying upon) such articles. It might set an unhealthy precedence for improper reliances.Congrats to the author thereof, but I am a bit circumspect regarding its judicial use/reliance. |